The one page that decides who gets the money

Unclaimed Retirement Money Series · Post 1 of 6
Category: Retirement Plan Basics

A retirement account can hold years of contributions, employer money, and investment growth. But when the participant dies, the account does not necessarily follow the person’s will, divorce decree, or most recent family relationship.

For many employer-sponsored retirement plans, the controlling record is the beneficiary designation accepted by the plan.

That designation may be a paper form signed decades ago. It may be an electronic record completed during enrollment. Either way, the plan generally follows its own documents and procedures when determining who receives the money.

Navigant’s principal puts the issue plainly:

“There is nothing in it to bill for, which is exactly why it goes undone.”

That small administrative task can have a meaningful effect on a large retirement account.

The plan’s records come first

A beneficiary is the person or entity designated to receive a benefit after the participant’s death. The designation usually identifies a primary beneficiary and, in some cases, one or more contingent beneficiaries.

Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA, a plan fiduciary must administer the plan according to the documents governing it. Federal law also requires the plan to specify the basis on which payments are made.

In plain language, the plan administrator is not generally free to decide who seems most deserving. The administrator looks to:

  • The plan document and summary plan description
  • The beneficiary designation recorded by the plan
  • Any plan-required spousal consent
  • Any valid Qualified Domestic Relations Order, commonly called a QDRO
  • The plan’s claims and distribution procedures

This structure creates a clear administrative process. It also creates a risk: an outdated beneficiary designation can remain legally effective even when the participant’s personal circumstances have changed substantially.

A will may leave everything to children. A divorce decree may say that an ex-spouse gives up rights to retirement benefits. A participant may later remarry. Those documents may matter in other legal settings, but they do not automatically replace the beneficiary designation held by an ERISA plan.

Why a will may not control a 401(k)

A will generally governs property that passes through the probate process. A retirement plan account usually passes under the plan’s beneficiary provisions instead.

That means a will can say, “Leave everything to my children,” while the retirement plan’s records name a former spouse. If the beneficiary form was valid under the plan’s rules and was never changed, the plan may be required to pay the former spouse.

The plan administrator does not typically interpret the will and then revise the plan’s payment instructions. Doing so would require the administrator to investigate outside documents, determine which document is more recent, and evaluate state-law questions about property and inheritance.

ERISA’s plan-document rule is designed to avoid that uncertainty. The administrator follows the plan’s established procedures rather than conducting a broad investigation into the participant’s intent.

What divorce does, and does not, change

Divorce is one of the most common events that exposes an outdated designation.

Many people assume that a divorce automatically removes a former spouse from a retirement account. That assumption can be wrong for an ERISA-covered plan. A divorce decree may address retirement benefits between the former spouses, but the decree does not necessarily change the plan’s beneficiary record.

There are important exceptions and technical rules. Some retirement benefits can be divided through a valid QDRO. Some plans recognize a specific disclaimer or beneficiary-change process. Certain pension plans also have special surviving-spouse protections and consent requirements.

The central point is that the plan’s rules determine which documents are effective against the plan.

A divorce decree standing alone may not be enough.

What courts have held

Three cases illustrate why beneficiary designations deserve attention.

Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 2001

In Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, the U.S. Supreme Court considered a Washington law that automatically revoked a former spouse’s beneficiary designation after divorce.

Courts have held that ERISA preempts state revocation-on-divorce statutes as applied to ERISA plans, and that such statutes cannot require plan administrators to pay someone other than the beneficiary identified in the plan documents. Courts have also held that allowing different state-by-state rules would complicate plan administration by requiring administrators to research state laws, choice-of-law issues, and changes in family status before distributing benefits.

For an ERISA plan, courts have held that a divorce does not necessarily remove an ex-spouse from the beneficiary record.

Read the Supreme Court’s opinion in Egelhoff v. Egelhoff.

Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont, 2009

Courts have held that a plan administrator may properly pay benefits to the beneficiary listed in the plan’s records when the participant did not complete the plan’s required process for changing the beneficiary.

They have also held that a waiver in a divorce decree is not automatically void under ERISA’s anti-alienation provision, but that principle does not permit a plan administrator to disregard the plan’s procedures or the beneficiary designation on file. ERISA’s plan-document rule operates as a straightforward administrative rule: the participant receives clear instructions for changing the designation, and the plan uses the designation recorded under those instructions.

Read the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont.

Carmona v. Carmona, Ninth Circuit, 2008

In Carmona v. Carmona, the Ninth Circuit addressed survivor benefits under a pension plan and an attempt to use a state-law constructive trust to redirect those benefits.

Courts have held that surviving-spouse benefits that vest under a plan’s terms cannot be reassigned through a state-law constructive-trust theory when that theory is used to avoid ERISA’s QDRO, preemption, and anti-alienation rules.

They have also held that this principle is tied to conflicts with the plan’s structure and does not automatically mean every constructive trust in every retirement dispute is barred.

Read the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Carmona v. Carmona.

What the plan administrator must do

When a beneficiary form conflicts with a will or divorce decree, the plan administrator generally begins with the plan’s own records.

For an ERISA-covered plan, the administrator must:

  1. Review the plan document and applicable distribution provisions.
  2. Identify the beneficiary designation properly recorded under the plan.
  3. Check for a valid QDRO or other plan-recognized exception.
  4. Follow the plan’s claims and appeal procedures if a dispute is raised.
  5. Pay benefits according to the governing plan documents and applicable federal requirements.

The administrator is not generally required to decide whether a will expresses the participant’s latest wishes. The administrator is also not generally permitted to substitute a divorce decree for the plan’s required beneficiary-change process.

If competing claims create uncertainty, the plan may pause distribution while following its claims procedure or seek a court process that resolves the dispute. That is different from deciding, based only on an outside document, that the named beneficiary should be replaced.

For plan sponsors and HR directors, this distinction matters. Participant communications can explain where beneficiary designations are located, how changes are made, and why outside estate documents may not update the plan. A clear reminder after enrollment, marriage, divorce, birth, adoption, or a job transition can help prevent an outdated form from controlling later.

The short checklist

  • Check your designation. Confirm the primary and contingent beneficiaries listed by each retirement plan.
  • Keep a copy. Save the confirmation, completed form, or electronic record with other important documents.
  • Revisit it after any life change. Review the designation after marriage, divorce, birth, adoption, death in the family, or a change in estate plans.

Plan terms differ. Some plans have special spousal-consent requirements, pension survivor rules, or procedures that are not obvious from the beneficiary form alone. Legal and plan-specific questions belong with your own plan administrator or qualified counsel. Tax questions belong with a tax professional.

This article is educational and is not legal, tax, investment, or individualized financial advice. Navigant Advisory Group LLC is a Minneapolis-based financial education firm founded in June 2004. Black women-owned and operated since 2004. Navigant does not serve as a recordkeeper, custodian, or investment manager, and it does not manage retirement accounts or client funds. The firm provides financial education.

For additional retirement education, visit Navigant’s Retirement Resource Center or the participant education page.

Your guide for the journey.